Rachel Maddow: Tucker Carlson is “dangerous” but talented

Rachel Maddow’s political beliefs stand in direct contrast to her longtime Fox News rival Tucker Carlson, but the powerful MSNBC has refused to deal an outright blow to her rival of late. Vanity Fair Profile personly. After all, it was Carlson who first gave Maddow a paid TV position when she worked on the MSNBC series “Tucker” nearly 17 years ago.

“He’s doing a great job now,” Maddow said. “But look at Tucker’s career. The first show I worked on was his 11 a.m. show on MSNBC which nobody remembers. But he’s always been on the job and he’s always been talented. It’s just — it turns out that’s his moment.”

When asked to consider a recent Times investigation that reported how Carlson “weapons the fears and grievances of his viewers to create what may be the most racist show in the history of space news,” Maddow replied, “For me, it’s more of an issue, you know.” , how dangerous are Tucker’s ideas, and how they interact with the growth of the authoritarian right in the Republican Party, more than this question, which was clearly the main impetus of the report, are interested in how they deconstruct the cause of its success.”

“If you think of baseball players, who are very competitive and who fight to win and who have competitions, and some of those are bittersweet competitions, it doesn’t mean that you don’t study their star throwing style,” Maddow added about why it shouldn’t be rejected. her competitors on Fox News.” That doesn’t mean you don’t appreciate everything they do in terms of, you know, where they put their short position in order to give them a better defense. There’s kind of, like, respect for the game, in terms of people who do well and people who are good at it.”

Maddow continued, “I mean, that was the basis of my professional friendship with Roger Ailes. I wanted tips from him on how to get better in TV. And he was willing to talk to me about what I was doing well, and what I was doing poorly, to help me improve.”

Read Maddow’s full profile at Vanity Fair website.



[ad_2]

Related posts

Leave a Comment