Johnny Depp Take the next step in his appeal of the $2 million jury verdict Amber Heard In a defamation trial last spring.
In the appeal filed on Wednesday in Virginia Court of AppealsA Pirates of the Caribbean representative called the jury’s decision to award Heard’s money a “mistake.”
It is the latest step in the explosive legal battle between Heard and Debwho sued his ex-wife for defamation in a 2018 editorial for The Washington Post in which she described herself as a victim of domestic violence and spoke of feeling “the full force of our culture’s anger toward women who speak up.”
Johnny Depp signs the statement after winning the trial
After the dramatic eight-week, televised trial, from April to June, a seven-person jury found Heard slandered deep on all three counts.
Jury award Dib 10 million dollars in damages and $5 million in punitive damages, before Fairfax County Judge Benny Azcaret The latter reduced to the legal limit of the state 350 thousand dollars.
Fans chant Johnny Depp’s name after defamation ruling
Heard won one of three lawsuits against her ex-husband, and the jury found out deep, Through his attorney Adam Waldman, he discredited her by calling her allegations about the 2016 incident an “ambush, a hoax.”
She received $2 million in damages, but $0 in punitive damages, leaving the Aquaman actress with $8.35 million out of her pocket.
Both Depp and Heard appealed the sentences
As Depp has argued, he heard No evidence was presented at trial that he was personally involved in directing or making any of Waldman’s three statements, and that his attorney did not witness any of the interactions between the former spouses prior to his appointment.
Last month , he heard She also explained several reasons why she intends to appeal the trial verdict which found her guilty of defaming her ex-husband.
On October 11 I heard The attorneys filed an appeal memorandum detailing 16 grounds for appeal, including the claim that the case should have been dismissed because it should not have been held in Northern Virginia.
In addition, he argues, the UK’s 2020 defamation ruling, which sided with Heard, should have been accepted as evidence.
Also criticize the basis deep The case, claiming that portions of Depp’s Washington Post op-ed that he claimed denigrated him were “executable as statements of facts, not non-justiciable expressions of opinion” and “enforceable as implicit libel”.
.
[ad_2]
