tThe conservative majority on the Supreme Court appears to be sympathetic to a Christian graphic artist who objects to the design of wedding websites for same-sex couples. But in Monday’s debates, liberal justices suggested that allowing that distinction could open the door to a broader possibility The companies refuse to serve customers who are black, Jewish, Muslim, interracial couples, and many more.
The Colorado case is the latest conflict between religion and LGBT rights to land before the Supreme Court. A case involving a Colorado baker and a wedding cake to a gay couple ended in limited resolution five years ago and will return to court.
While the justices squabbled inside the courtroom, protesters from both sides gathered outside. The Freedom of Expression group provided a long list of speakers outlining their views on the importance of freedom of expression, while a smaller group of counter-demonstrators, Many carrying LGBTQ+ flags, did their best to put out the loudspeakers with blow horns and megaphones.
After the hearing, Laurie Smith, the graphic designer from Colorado who was at the center of this case, descended the steps of the United States Supreme Court with her attorney, Christine Wagner. Both took turns speaking to the crowd of supporters outside the courtroom.
“I love people and create for everyone, including those who identify as LGBTQ,” Smith said. “Like other artists, my decision about what to create, what to custom, is always based on the message, never the individual ordering the artwork.”
.
[ad_2]
